63.92 BTC
5.56 BTC

BTC worth over $5000 before 2015

The value of one bitcoin in USD will surpass $5000 as per btc-e on bitcoincharts before 2015.

Closure or similar failure of btc-e to provide said rate before over $5k is reached will result in early resolution at No.

Safety tools like SSL encryption and two-factor authentication define trusted Bitcoin casinos, protecting users’ crypto assets and personal data.
  • Category:Bitcoin
  • Bet started:9 months 5 days ago (13-01-2014)
  • Bet closing: in 1 month 3 weeks (07-12-2014)
  • Resolution: in 2 months 2 weeks (01-01-2015)
  • Weighted No: 2`611`164
  • Weighted Yes: 387`999
  • Current weight: 15`956 ( from 100`000 to 1 )
  • Confirmed bets: 53 ( No: 41  /  Yes: 12 )
  • Histograph:
  • Calculator:
    placing a winning BTC bet on:
    Yes pays:   BTC
    No pays:   BTC
    after fees, at current weight and assuming no one else bets
CONFIRMED BETS: 69.48 BTC
TIME BET WEIGHT BTC IN IN BTC OUT OUT
13-01-14 18:15 No 100`000 0.08498509 14LhB /1MA74 
 
13-01-14 18:18 Yes 100`000 0.03000000 14MF8 /1MA74 
 
13-01-14 18:18 No 100`000 0.07000000 14mf3 /1F5xm 
 
13-01-14 21:44 Yes 99`956 0.01000000 14MFR /1FkwN 
 
13-01-14 23:32 Yes 99`933 0.00900001 14MjH /1Keqd 
 
14-01-14 08:59 Yes 99`813 0.10000000 14mmv /13GJN 
 
14-01-14 13:44 Yes 99`752 0.23344443 14MPg /1Ef6c 
 
18-01-14 05:52 Yes 98`630 0.01000000 14oLW /1MisH 
 
18-01-14 20:14 No 98`447 0.50000000 14ora /1JboP 
 
02-02-14 03:13 No 94`080 0.30000000 16Dvm /1AJqP 
 
10-02-14 11:24 Yes 91`531 0.40000000 16h1Z /1GLZW 
 
27-02-14 03:07 No 86`442 0.10000000 16mVt /1DNQn 
 
05-04-14 01:24 No 75`157 0.00300000 17deX /16pvA 
 
10-04-14 03:55 No 73`597 1.00000000 17ehE /1GMVV 
 
26-04-14 16:45 No 68`544 0.25000000 17JvR /1Cs1E 
 
29-04-14 15:36 Yes 67`642 0.05000000 17LPo /1JfDC 
 
02-05-14 20:19 No 66`665 0.00221361 17mQD /1Juyf 
 
06-05-14 11:29 Yes 65`555 4.60000000 17NLQ /1GLZW 
 
06-05-14 19:42 Yes 65`451 0.10000000 17NMe /151en 
 
06-05-14 22:17 No 65`418 0.04312500 17Nmm /1BASZ 
 
10-05-14 22:12 No 64`197 0.50000000 17ouK /1L5Wk 
 
11-05-14 20:18 No 63`915 0.03000000 17ozk /19rzY 
 
14-05-14 16:23 No 63`048 1.00000000 17PLD /18gDD 
 
24-05-14 23:35 No 59`901 0.03000000 17S5F /13833 
 
27-05-14 18:09 No 59`053 0.02000000 17SVy /16pvA 
 
01-06-14 13:47 No 57`581 0.30000000 17TnT /1LtQ5 
 
02-06-14 13:16 No 57`282 0.30000000 17Txp /1G2ri 
 
06-06-14 10:44 No 56`092 0.07500000 17vCZ /1NfXM 
 
08-06-14 15:33 No 55`419 0.10000000 17vxC /1ChXe 
 
10-06-14 03:47 No 54`958 3.00000000 17wg9 /18SHQ 
 
10-06-14 20:37 No 54`743 0.05000000 17x3K /151rt 
 
12-06-14 23:58 No 54`089 4.00000000 17zd4 /18cAY 
 
16-06-14 19:29 No 52`924 0.01000000 1888v /1DjkR 
 
20-06-14 01:14 No 51`934 0.12000000 18aVD /1NRaN 
 
20-06-14 01:26 No 51`932 0.12000000 18aVf /1NRaN 
 
22-06-14 13:48 No 51`163 0.50000000 18DXn /1MTvt 
 
29-06-14 19:07 No 48`956 0.50000000 18GtM /151rt 
 
01-07-14 03:51 No 48`540 0.04352637 18HKV /1PpQ7 
 
01-07-14 04:47 No 48`528 11.55930323 18HKV /1PpQ7 
 
03-07-14 05:59 No 47`901 0.10000000 18J3Y /1Wang 
 
03-07-14 14:36 No 47`792 1.00000000 18J5R /13Lci 
 
07-07-14 08:08 Yes 46`652 0.01000000 18RNW /16X5t 
 
09-07-14 23:55 No 45`839 0.00000001 18J5R /13Lci 
 
23-07-14 01:39 No 41`845 9.00000000 18Wnw /177Zo 
 
10-08-14 23:32 No 36`066 5.00000000 193ie /1MiTH 
 
17-08-14 00:29 No 34`220 1.00000000 1992w /1DNQn 
 
01-09-14 12:18 No 29`486 11.00000000 19dr1 /17kM9 
 
04-09-14 02:07 Yes 28`699 0.01000000 19f8r /139Uf 
 
05-09-14 20:30 No 28`159 0.10000000 19fiw /1Keqd 
 
10-09-14 01:13 No 26`877 0.10000000 1KTvY /19WrL 
 
12-09-14 20:22 No 26`022 2.00000000 127kG /12K2S 
 
15-09-14 00:36 No 25`356 0.01000000 1M5Kf /1F7jq 
 
20-09-14 23:01 No 23`543 10.00000000 1LMFp /1BxkH 
 
DISCUSSION
  • #2328: Anonymous 15-01-14 at 17:06
     

    Why would it matter if btc-e is down when the price hits 5k? That’s far more likely than the price not going that high. So… it’s a bet on whether btc-e will survive the year? Da fuck?

    #2329: Anonymous 15-01-14 at 17:11
     

    +1. The action has all been on yes so far. Can the terms be updated to fallback to a different exchange? That btc-e condition makes this a muddled bet.

    #2330: Anonymous 15-01-14 at 17:48
     

    How’s the bet “muddled”? Cause it doesn’t say what you want it to say? Make a different one.

    #2331: Anony-mousse 15-01-14 at 20:29
     

    i think the ‘muddle’ balances it out pretty well, ironically.
    I like how this is btc-e only, MtGox sucks

    #2332: Anonymous 15-01-14 at 20:32
     

    the link refers to the MTGox figures, mods please fix to BTC-e.

    #2333: Anonymous 15-01-14 at 21:26
     

    Bet should be refunded, confusion between Gox and btc-e in the spec.

    #2335: Anonymous 15-01-14 at 21:39
     

    that’s not worth the trouble for a refund anon, just a simple link-edit

    #2336: Muddle me 15-01-14 at 23:02
     

    It’s muddled because it is a bet on two very different things that are unrelated. One is the BTC price. Another is whether btc-e will stay open.

    #2337: Anonymous 15-01-14 at 23:03
     

    And these are unrelated how?

    #2338: Anonymous 16-01-14 at 02:04
     

    Sorry OP, your bet sucks. I bet on the btc -> 10k one, and quite happily, but not this one.

    #2339: Anonymous 16-01-14 at 02:18
     

    I made this bet, and as you can see on this bet in the propositions (when you hold your mouse on it) BitBet has eddited the laust clausule in themselves. so i don’t really suck that bad. thank you 🙂

    #2344: Anonymous 16-01-14 at 10:28
     

    The link is just the default for bitcoincharts’ actual charts, look at the url. I don’t think any Goxness is implied.

    #2346: Anonymous 16-01-14 at 11:27
     

    What’s to edit, it links to blockchain charts, you have to select BTC-E in the drop-down.

    #2351: Anonymous 16-01-14 at 17:59
     

    if what you guys say is a double-bet, it’s a double no for me 🙂

    #2413: So Muddled 28-01-14 at 19:32
     

    The 10,000 bet has 67 btc on yes. This one has next to nothing. Not that its muddled.

    #2414: Anony-mousse 28-01-14 at 19:53
     

    ^
    it’s a long way to Jan 1st 2015 after all, and some bets have turned out to be real nailbiters later on, time will tell

    #2900: Anonymous 06-05-14 at 11:24
     

    IC EV

    #2914: Anonymous 14-05-14 at 13:49
     

    Basically if you bet 1 bitcoin on this to say no, if prices hold, you risk $500 to win $500.

    If you are wrong and it is $5000, you basically lost $5000.

    #2915: Anonymous 14-05-14 at 19:28
     

    #2914 follow the logic to $4999. How much would that bet on no be worth?

    #2934: Anonymous 20-05-14 at 16:33
     

    Not to mention you get your stake back… Lots of room on the boat still 🙂

    #4006: Peter Schiff 24-09-14 at 03:04
     

    Lol, some of you seriously thought $5k might happen?

    Buy gold, it’s cheap.

    #4007: Peter Schiff 24-09-14 at 03:09
     

    Remember, listeners, you can’t inject anybody with a bitcoin. You can’t make a bitcoin necklace. You can’t fill your teeth with bitcoin. You can’t put it in a spaceship.

    #4017: Anonymous 24-09-14 at 15:33
     

    #4006, You Can’t Hash Gold!

    Once your gold teleports and doesn’t need to be guarded we might give a shit.

    #4018: Derpnonymous 24-09-14 at 23:13
     

    Pretty sure I could put a bitcoin in a spaceship, asshole. That’s like saying you can’t bring data to space.

    #4108: Anonymous 06-10-14 at 12:00
     

    BTC2015.com for sale 🙂

    contact us via our website to grab this domain.

    #4109: Anonymous 06-10-14 at 12:14
     

    That’s ok, it can stay ungrabbed.

    #4110: Anonymous 06-10-14 at 15:59
     

    Oh, it will be grabbed…

    IN AN ALLEY!

NAME
 
XVII + nineteen =