BTC to rise vs USD in February
This bet resolves as Yes if, at all times on 28th February, Bitcoin trades above 216.90 USD on bitstamp, as per bitcoinwisdom.com .
Bet outcome: Yes
- Category:Bitcoin
- Bet started:1 month 1 week ago (03-02-2015)
- Bet closed: 2 weeks 3 days ago (26-02-2015)
- Resolved: 2 weeks 10 hours ago (01-03-2015)
- Weighted No: 192`705
- Weighted Yes: 447`202
- Confirmed bets: 17 ( No: 7 / Yes: 10 )
- Histograph:
CONFIRMED BETS: 6.64 BTC
TIME | BET | WEIGHT | BTC IN | IN | BTC OUT | OUT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
03-02-15 20:12 | Yes | 99`995 | 0.06000000 | 1JRdc | 0.08533960 | 19YgU | |
03-02-15 20:12 | No | 99`995 | 0.04000000 | 1QDvT | 0.00000000 | 1FMEg | |
03-02-15 20:12 | Yes | 99`995 | 3.00000000 | 14b8F | 4.26698041 | 1FMEg | |
03-02-15 21:23 | No | 99`773 | 1.75000000 | 1KPDy | 0.00000000 | 1Q9Q6 | |
03-02-15 21:41 | No | 99`717 | 0.10000000 | 1AZR1 | 0.00000000 | 16m21 | |
04-02-15 17:25 | Yes | 96`005 | 0.40000000 | 16SU7 | 0.56203044 | 1AnVP | |
05-02-15 13:05 | Yes | 92`306 | 0.75000000 | 1DTzP | 1.04181265 | 17Pnq | |
06-02-15 00:33 | Yes | 90`151 | 0.25000000 | 1AXkY | 0.34494160 | 1MisH | |
10-02-15 06:21 | No | 71`009 | 0.04000000 | 1BsEV | 0.00000000 | 1CLqw | |
12-02-15 12:48 | No | 60`771 | 0.00600000 | 1Hwui | 0.00000000 | 14wqg | |
12-02-15 12:48 | No | 60`771 | 0.00700000 | 125Es | 0.00000000 | 14wqg | |
14-02-15 07:38 | Yes | 52`716 | 0.19692792 | 1Ng3t | 0.23984182 | 1A9Sj | |
14-02-15 21:56 | No | 50`027 | 0.01000000 | 1EFyC | 0.00000000 | 15nfe | |
20-02-15 03:45 | Yes | 26`371 | 0.02000000 | 1KTFp | 0.02208029 | 1AnVP | |
20-02-15 10:45 | Yes | 25`055 | 0.00500000 | 1F6ie | 0.00549162 | 12nCu | |
21-02-15 14:42 | Yes | 19`800 | 0.00050000 | 17GgJ | 0.00053780 | 1L1Ew | |
25-02-15 19:43 | Yes | 804 | 0.00500000 | 1Lvuv | 0.00496738 | 1KSzS |
DISCUSSION
#4549: Anonymous 04-02-15 at 20:13
Name of this bet is deceiving;trololololo
#4555: Anonymous 06-02-15 at 03:19
What happens if bitcoinwisdom is down but bitstamp still trades?
#4557: Anonymous 06-02-15 at 08:19
Logically then it would be Yes, as you could not point to a time where it didn’t trade under the target according to the source
#4558: Anonymous 06-02-15 at 08:19
Over not under