BTC difficulty increases to remain under 16%
All incremental difficulty changes before August 2014 on the bitcoin network shall be less than 16% as per gribble’s prevdiffchange command.
Bet outcome: No
- Category:Bitcoin
- Bet started:3 months 2 weeks ago (20-03-2014)
- Bet closed: 3 months 1 week ago (25-03-2014)
- Resolved: 3 months 1 week ago (25-03-2014)
- Weighted No: 1`369`780
- Weighted Yes: 56`992
- Confirmed bets: 13 ( No: 11 / Yes: 2 )
- Histograph:
CONFIRMED BETS: 14.72 BTC
| TIME | BET | WEIGHT | BTC IN | IN | BTC OUT | OUT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-03-14 15:03 | Yes | 99`987 | 0.50000000 | 173Re | 0.00000000 | 1PrFZ | |
| 20-03-14 15:12 | Yes | 99`982 | 0.07000000 | 173Uz | 0.00000000 | 1F5xm | |
| 20-03-14 15:12 | No | 99`982 | 0.03000000 | 173TS | 0.03093566 | 1PrFZ | |
| 21-03-14 17:15 | No | 99`063 | 0.10000000 | 174b7 | 0.10308103 | 1Keqd | |
| 21-03-14 17:52 | No | 99`041 | 0.20000000 | 174fN | 0.20616026 | 1NfXM | |
| 22-03-14 04:11 | No | 98`677 | 0.40000000 | 175dG | 0.41226055 | 1Q9Q6 | |
| 23-03-14 08:17 | No | 97`686 | 1.00000000 | 178Pv | 1.03024312 | 13fPL | |
| 23-03-14 10:16 | No | 97`616 | 1.00000000 | 178qW | 1.03021428 | 1Eteo | |
| 24-03-14 01:20 | No | 97`084 | 1.00000000 | 17984 | 1.02999511 | 1BV4Y | |
| 24-03-14 01:56 | No | 97`063 | 1.00000000 | 179ar | 1.02998646 | 1Pxo1 | |
| 24-03-14 14:39 | No | 96`614 | 0.42500000 | 179rd | 0.43766563 | 1Q9Q6 | |
| 24-03-14 19:00 | No | 96`461 | 1.00000000 | 179tx | 1.02973846 | 1GXq4 | |
| 24-03-14 22:47 | No | 96`328 | 8.00000000 | 179Xt | 8.23746938 | 1NS8Z |
DISCUSSION
#2659: Anonymous 24-03-14 at 23:01
time to close?
#2660: Anonymous 24-03-14 at 23:17
What would you do if you gained commission on fees?
#2661: Anonymous 24-03-14 at 23:23
The next diff in 4 blocks looks like 17.7%
#2663: Anonymous 24-03-14 at 23:34
Go to gribble, find the prevdiffchange, see what it returns. When it’s 16% or more, then methinks this bet will resolve…
#2664: Anonymous 24-03-14 at 23:51
;;prevdiffchange
17.80244
#2665: Anonymous 24-03-14 at 23:55
Second that notion. Lets close and resolve this please.
#2666: Anonymous 25-03-14 at 03:40
It has to be less than 16%. More does nothing.
#2668: Anonymous 25-03-14 at 11:01
I hope you’re trolling. All incremental increases under 16% . If one incremental increase is NOT under 16%, that statement is false.
#2669: Anonymous 25-03-14 at 12:44
Seems it’s clodes snow